Very good commentary, Tim. Thank you. Of course, if the price of fuel
continues to go up, trade off time can come sooner or partially offset the
interest/income loss.
Another, less noted advantage of tank water heaters in times of distress
(earthquake, for example), is the reservoir for emergency. Most
municipalities require heavy strapping for these, in case of motion. But
at least you have 40 gallons or so of fresh water. Humans can last days
without food, but not without good water.
For Mr. M. Thomas, I tried the link but I received the "404" page error.
Thanks.
Best wishes to all,
Leonard Juska
Costa Mesa, CA
Doug Siebert
21 Jan 2008, 11:59
Tim,
Would Bob really need to spend $1550 extra on a tankless water heater for
his vacation home? A water heater sized for a household of five like yours
has to be a lot bigger than one for a vacation home, plus he might be able
to get by with one of a bit lesser quality since it will see less use and
it is perhaps not as big of an issue if it fails. After all, he is only
there during the summer, so his family could suffer through a few days of
cold showers over the 4th of July more easily than they could in January!
I see tankless water heaters sized adequately for one shower at a time for
$500 which would probably be fine for that vacation home (3 gpm, 60* temp
rise, 10 yr warranty) To me, the advantages of not having to remember to
turn the heater on/off when coming and going, draining it for the winter,
etc. are probably worth spending a few hundred dollars more versus the
standard 40 gallon tank.
Also consider the space savings, since vacation homes are often a bit
cramped as it is. Finally, I think that endless hot water is almost a must
have in a vacation home where you bring friends and their kids and the
floor is covered with sleeping bags at night. It doesn't matter how big
the tank is or how quickly you make the kids shower, it always runs out
before the last person takes their shower!
AsktheBuilder
21 Jan 2008, 13:12
Doug,
Bob actually emailed me hours ago after he saw the column. Believe it or
not, he said it is a large four-bedroom home and he expects guests that
would be taking showers at the same time. So much for your pint-sized
tankless heater suggestion. Bob might spend at least $1,200 more in 2008
dollars. People really need to do the math. As I said, if money is not an
issue and you want continuous hot water these things are the bees' knees.
MIchael Thomas
21 Jan 2008, 16:31
Hmm.... I see my contribution was deleted.
I thought it was useful - for one thing it included a link to the ONLY
study I've ever been a able to find that evaluated tankless payback under
controlled conditions simulating actual household use, and I wonder if
whoever hit the delete button bothered to follow the primary link, or just
assumed it was a SPAMed advert.
If anyone is curious you can probably GOOGLE it up, with was done by the /
Exelon Services Federal Group (ESFG) for the Okaloosa Gas District.
AsktheBuilder
22 Jan 2008, 08:52
Michael,
They were deleted because the links didn't work........ It is not a
conspiracy...... Instead of making everyone work to find it, can't you
summarize in 100 words the findings? Just state the facts.....
Brett
23 Jan 2008, 20:12
Tim,
Perhaps another concern to be taken into account is that of tank water
heaters exploding. My grandparents heard of a few such events while talking
to people who have vacation homes in the Island Park,ID area. I don't know
how often tank heaters fail and the exact circumstances that cause it but,
it was a serious concern with my grandparents when they would leave their
cabin for extended periods. I also realize you're comparing the costs of
new tanks, not old ones. How much do you think, of a difference in safety
is there, if any, over the long term?
Doug Siebert
23 Jan 2008, 22:13
Brett,
Newer water heaters have safety mechanisms to prevent that sort of thing,
so it should be only older ones doing that. Mythbusters did a segment on
that and they had to disable two separate safety mechanisms to get the
water heater to go overpressure and explode. But when it did, it shot
several hundred feet up in the air, you would not want to be home when one
of those blew!
I would think the only risk of explosion with today's water heaters would
be a gas explosion, which could happen with any gas fired water heater,
with or without tank.
Michael Thomas
24 Jan 2008, 09:10
Even with *electric* water heaters you can get some pretty vicious events
if things go wrong in the right way, for example this 5 gal electric unit
demolished a considerable hunk of CMU wall at a high school
http://www.safteng.net/Accident%20Photos/Hot%20Water%20heater%20explosion.h
tm
- or -
http://tinyurl.com/29hyyl
If someone is determined to run a gas fired unit at an unattended location,
IMO an auto gas shutoff like the Watts 210-5 would be a Good Idea.
AsktheBuilder
24 Jan 2008, 15:14
Brett,
Ditto Doug. If the T & P valve and the gas valve fail, then explosion is a
reality. I am not worried about mine.
A Rob
28 Jan 2008, 12:54
About a year ago, I had tankless systems installed at our house and at our
vacation cabin.
At the house, we got a very large unit, a Rinnai. We have 3 teens and 2
exchange students so there is a lot of demand for hot water for showering
and laundry. Bottomless hot water supply has really helped to get it all
done without worrying about a showering schedule. We can start a load of
laundry and hop in the shower, no problem. A side benefit which makes the
economics work out is that by moving the hot water heater into a side
closet, we gained a large pantry-size closet in a spot where storage was
really needed. We could not have renovated to gain space there. Also, I
do not have to worry about the tank leaking (which happened the day after
we bought our first house, so I know it is possible!), ruining my
pergo-style floors. The old tank was in an interior closet under the
stairs. We had to move it to get a place to run the vent pipe.
At the cabin, we did have a water freeze last year, downstream from the
water heater so its entire contents emptied into the cabin. This happened
in an area which does not normally have a hard freeze, during a time when
we go out there semi-weekly. We discovered it about 10 days after the leak
happened, so we ended up in a major remodeling project which included
tearing out a tub and replacing the subfloor under it. The insurance did
not cover it because it was considered negligence. Bad surprise! I've
switched insurance companies.
Anyway, the issue with getting a tankless system at the cabin was low water
pressure because it is on a well that does not produce that much water.
One plumber recommended against the system for that reason, but another
plumber who installs these regularly said it would work because there was
enough pressure to take a shower (he used a plumbing tool I don't own to
determine the pressure). It works because we do have a tank for water in
the pump house which is slightly uphill from the cabin and acts like a
water tower. The brand we installed there is Noritz.
Anyway, it is great for cabin use. Like one commenter said, at a cabin you
either have no use for hot water or you need great quantities of it. The
tankless system is perfect for that. It does not take long to get hot
water, so there is no great waste of water while you wait for the hot to
get to the faucet. We can shower, run laundry and wash dishes all at the
same time. I also was able to make one bedroom 3 feet larger by moving the
heater to an unused closet in an adjoining room. The gain of this space far
outstrips the cost of the heater.
One thing to consider is the electrical supply needed to start the system.
We use an inverter and a marine battery if the power is off, but I believe
there are other ways around it.
Water heaters do make good water storage devices for emergency use. You
can get second hand ones cheap, possibly remove the element for better
water quality, and store them out in the garage or some hidden area of your
property in case you lose water. I wouldn't choose to keep a tank water
heater just for the reason of emergency water storage. Based on my
experiences at the cabin, you can go through a lot of water very fast by
showering and doing laundry (we have a 1500 gallon tank), so one water
heater is just a bare minimum supply.
In my case, I consider the units to be paid off already. I have gained
storage space, living space, convenience, time, access to unlimited hot
water when needed, and peace of mind that my tanks will not fail and get me
involved in future emergency remodeling projects.
Roger N.
31 Jan 2008, 12:36
All this info neglects one thing that I've read and that is the lag time to
get hot water to the use point. On average, I understand 3/4 of a gallon
per use point. That's a lot of wasted water at some cost. In addition,
there can be multiple instances of this water wastage, i.e. at the sink
while washing dishes if you turn off the faucet mid-cleaning and start it
up again, you, once again, wait for several minutes and 3/4 of a gallon to
get your hot water. Now, I've read about this item from Chili Pepper
Appliance that pumps the water in a big loop from the water heater through
the hot water piping to the Chilipepper, and on through the cold water
piping back to the water heater inlet, a big loop. Seems, though, you'd
need one for each point of use. At $180 each that would add up. Has
anyone had any experience with this item?
AsktheBuilder
31 Jan 2008, 12:50
Roger,
You have the lag time with either a storage or a tankless heater. If you
want to discover much about recirculating loops, read all of those columns
here at AsktheBuilder.com. I have several - gravity loops as well as pump
systems.
John M
01 Feb 2008, 19:36
It seems to me that both Tim Carter's article and A. Rob's post are right.
Tim is right to point out that the economics of a tankless system may not
save you as much as you had hoped and that it could take decades for these
savings to amount to anything meaningful. And you might actually save
nothing but actually spend MORE if you start taking endless hot showers.
OTOH, I found all the points in A. Rob's post about the many non-monetary
benefits of a tankless system to be an equally valid perspective for those
to whom the benefits matter. BTW, another benefit of many of the tankless
systems which I did not see previously mentioned is that you can raise and
lower the temperature of the hot water using a wall mounted remote control
resembling a thermostat. Another potential benefit which is either quite
valuable or completely meaningless depending on your personal opinion of
it.
In my case, I'm still weighing the decision in my mind. I planning to have
a major bit of plumbing work done in the near future to connect my 53 year
old house in upstate NY to the town water and sewer lines. A scribbled
note on my tank heater's manual says it was installed in 1979. So it seems
like a good idea to replace it since it's coming up on its 29'th year. I'm
guessing installing a new long warranty, energy saving tank heater would
cost me ~$1000. A new tankless heater maybe twice that. Haven't decided
which way to go yet.
One thing that confuses me about comparing costs is that it's hard to
determine just how much I an paying for gas. The cost/therm varies during
the year. In the summer I use less than 10 therms/month, but I effectively
paid NYSEG over $3.35/therm for them. During the winter I use 100 therms or
more each month, but the effect cost per therm is half what it is for a
summer month.
Wayne
08 Mar 2008, 09:04
We have a new house in the carribbean with a 40 gal tank and it works well.
No complaints.
However we have begun to have some worries as the tank is above the
bathroom in a crawl space. If the tank ever develops a leak we would not
know until something bad occurs, like the ceiling coming down, water
stains, etc.
There is supposed to be a tray but if the leak was large enough and we
didn't see the overflow then it could fail and release a high flow of water
which would cause a lot of damage.
And so we are considering a tankless system more from the reliability point
of view.
AsktheBuilder
12 Mar 2008, 07:52
Wayne,
So tell me what happens when some part or connection fails on the tankless
unit. Will the water go up or evaporate before it hits the ceiling? The
reason you give would not convince me you need a tankless unit. You can
easily install a drip pan with a 3-inch drain system that will take any
amount of water a normal heater would produce - even in a catastrophic
failure.
Should a tankless water heater ever be installed in the Attic in a hot
climate?
AsktheBuilder
15 Mar 2008, 07:19
Jon,
The answer is easy. Read the instructions provided by the manufacturer and
then get the final word from your local plumbing inspector. Your local laws
may not permit it.
S. Snider
31 Mar 2008, 11:47
I'm doing hurried research on water heaters this morning because I just
discovered that our conventional tank heater started leaking over the
weekend. Luckily, we moved the heater to the garage about 7 years ago, so
the damage is not severe.
The original heater was in the laundry room. When it failed after about 10
years, water seeped through adjacent walls destroying carpeting and vinyl
flooring in connecting rooms.
The cathode tubes in the second heater decomposed sending shards of debris
into all the water lines throughout the house and destroyed a new
diswasher.
So, it should be apparent why I'm not enthusiastic about buying a 4th tank
heater for my 27 year-old house.
However ---- any heater I buy needs to be electric. I'm not finding much
information about electric powered on-demand heaters. So far, I've located
only 2 manufacturers and neither seem to market a high-demand model.
What advice can you give me?
What can you tell me about
AsktheBuilder
01 Apr 2008, 06:09
S.,
My tankless water heater columns pretty much tell the tale. The fuel source
is of little importance since it is the same for whatever heater you buy.
But in your case, wait till you get the bill for the new power line to the
heater!!! Wow!!!
S.
01 Apr 2008, 06:29
ATB, are you saying that an electric tankless system will require a
different power connection than does the current conventional tank? How
so?
A Rob
01 Apr 2008, 08:55
We had an all-electric house at the time we started looking at the water
heaters. Electric on-demand heaters are available, but both the seasoned
plumbers and HVAC contractors I spoke with said they are too inefficient
for their cost.
We ended up adding a gas line to the house, since we also converted a wood
burning insert to a gas insert at the time. We convinced the gas company
that this was our primary heat source to get the line from the street from
them.
We have propane at the cabin and the unit works fine on LP gas. We did
have to do some gas line plumbing (hired an expert) to get the gas to the
heater location.
AsktheBuilder
04 Apr 2008, 04:51
S.,
That is correct. Get the installation instructions for the unit you are
considering. Wait until you see the amperage requirements. If you have a
standard 240 volt 30-amp circuit, it is too small.
Leo Cleversley
27 Apr 2008, 09:44
All,
According to the date time stamps, I am a couple months late on this
discussion. In any case, I just bought a small investment home, it's approx
648 sq ft. I am thinking of installing the Eemax EX190TC in order to both
save space and save money. The existing water heater is shot so the
replacement is a must. It is also gas and I am going all electric in this
house. I will be running all lines, water and electric myself and will only
need to fork out for the electrician to install the breaker and connect as
I am afraid of electricity. There are only three points requiring hot
water: The 1 bathroom and the kitchen (no dishwasher).
Any suggestions?
Thank you.
Norm
21 May 2008, 09:44
One other major cost factor to consider is that tank heater last between
7-9 years on average, whereas tankless last anywhere from 25-40 years. So
if you expect to keep your vacation home for 30 years, plan on replacing
the tank at least twice during that period. The cost of replacing those
two tanks will just make the tankless option a no brainer.
Lisa Lyons
25 May 2008, 09:22
I have a vacation cabin in the Adirondack Mountains of NY -- winters are
very cold. We drain the water in the cabin in the winter and turn off the
heater. Are there tankless not water heaters that can be totally drained so
that they will not be destroyed by residual water freezing in them during
the winter -- the temperatures in this region get down to minus 20 at
times.
Lisa
liz
25 Oct 2008, 06:00
Our small laundromat's "Natco tankless boiler corroded with leaking all
over the tubes. Do we need to fix the unit or replace? What system is best,
the tankless or with storage tank?
There is also curently a $400 tax rebate that helps offset the intitial
cost differences for installing a tankless system.
Sarah
29 Jan 2009, 00:58
I have a slightly less positive opinion, and perhaps Tim can offer some
ideas. We are on our SECOND electric tankless water heater. The first was
from a company in FL who claimed to provide the tankless water heaters used
by NASA. It started to leak after about a year, was uninstalled, FedExed
back to the company for repair (at my cost), returned and was still faulty.
The company was zero help and finally refused to help us or our plumber or
our electrician troubleshoot it. Buyer beware.
We chalked that up to a rotten company and bought a Bosch from a
reputable local plumbing company.
It's approximately a year later, and this morning the Bosch started
leaking.
During the process of the second installation, we had a water filtration
system installed, in case it was sediment in the water causing the damage.
The plumber comes tomorrow and I'm feverishly look for the paperwork,
hoping the thing is still under warranty.
We're in Southern Cal, so it can't be working too hard to heat water.
Besides this pesky little leaking problem (my concerns involve water +
electricity) these are the greatest things since sliced bread. I can do
laundry, run the dishwasher and shower all at the same time.
Now, if only I could do those without fear of electrocution in the shower
and being found by the paramedics in that state.
cvraman
02 Feb 2009, 18:36
I am in the market for a new water heater. After doing some research,
including this site, I concluded the tankless water heater was not a viable
option, given our location in the Upper Midwest. The cost differential
between the two was not trivial. In fact the cost of tankless including
installation was about 3X that of tank version.
I decided to do some digging, and I found the cost delta to be about $500
on ebay for the quoted equipment. So, even allowing for $1000 additional
cost of installation of the tankless version, there seemed to about $1700
of additional markup on the tankless by the plumber. Not sure, if this is
generally the case for all tankless or just the one I was quoted. The
referred models were Bradford White 50 gallon and Rinnai 199,000 BTUs.
ToddW
28 Feb 2009, 15:15
The vent kit was <$150 overnight from Rheem. Our unit can do 7.7gpm
(family of 4) and retails for ~$800. In reality it does less since our
water is in the 40s in winter.
The huge attraction for us was unlimited supply, use less propane which for
us meant less chance of needing a fill up in winter when the trucks can't
get out here. And to save some money. The largest attraction was the
ability to take showers w/no power.. we run our tankless on a battery
backup and with it's 2amp draw the battery backup lasts approx 30min. For
one person that could be a weeks worth of showers, and during the winter it
is not uncommon for us to lose power that long. (Not to mention we could
recharge it on the generator if we need be.)
Also, since ours cost us $0 other than the vent kit, we are saving $$$ from
day one.
I`d like to suggest people on wells use a ~$50 basic sediment filter prior
to feeding your hot water heater... it will keep it cleaner and running
better in between flushes.
Great site!
Tom Hoy
13 Mar 2009, 08:09
One thing I never see mentioned during discussions of tankless hot water
heaters is LEAKS!! Hot water heaters of any type are prone to leak with
age. Regular hot water heaters are often in the basement, often with a
drain nearby. Regular hot water heaters located in the living area should
have a catch pan beneath it. Tankless hot water heaters hang on a wall in
the living area and if they leak, the damage could be devastating. Any
thoughts I ever had about tankless hot water heaters were short-lived when
I had visions of coming home to a pool of water in my home.
Andy Webb
13 Mar 2009, 13:49
Perhaps for the cabin use, small tankless electric heaters would be a wise
choice. Install one near the bathroom/shower and the other at the kitchen
tap and heat at the point of use. Small electric units require no venting.
A good solution?
Keith
18 Apr 2009, 14:18
I am in the market for a new heater for whole house. My old tank heater is
leaking. I have been reading that the electric ones are better than the
gas just for the simple fact of the gas fumes sent in the air. Also there
is a rebate you can get from the gov't for some models. Which brand is the
best to get for wear and tear and the rebate.
Katy
14 May 2009, 16:19
Does anybody know anything about how far an electric water heater should be
from a property line? I ask because the developer next door wall mounted
two units that are approximately 22" from our property line (4 feet from
our bedroom and our front door).
We're concerned for safety but aren't sure what to do.
JRB
15 Jun 2009, 19:06
I plan to install point-of-use tankless water heaters under sinks in a
lightly used, small summer cabin in Wisconsin. Each fall I close down and
drain the water lines. The cabin is unheated for the winter, everything
will reach sub-zero temperatures.
What is the correct process for removing water from a tankless water heater
for winter? I'm concerned about residual water freezing and cracking the
heater.
All waterlines have previously been drained by gravity. I plan to now begin
using an air compressor to blow out lines starting at outdoor faucets. I'll
also re-do the plumbing to remove a mix of old iron pipes and poly pipes
and replace those with PEX.
W. Hawkins
11 Jul 2009, 17:19
Tim,
Where are you? You haven't answered a single question for over a year on
this post. Tankless H2O heaters are the future if they go with the right
company and plumber. These have been used in Asia and Europe for years and
do save energy which translates to money. The Government rebates now are
up to $1400 which covers most of the difference between a tank heater and
tankless including installation and venting. I recommend Noritz and will
be glad to assist you and answer all of your questions at 1(843)577-0801.
Tim, Sorry for the shameless plug but someone needs to answer all of these
questions.
keith
07 Sep 2009, 23:52
one thing missing in all the debate around tankless water heaters "paying
back" etc is the fact that they are more efficient which in turn means that
they pollute less. We are still pretending that we can live the way we did
in the 50's up until now and not feel any effects from consuming,
consuming, etc. Can't happen and these little devices seem a good fix for
now. Best would be to mix in Solar so as to have the water pre-warmed and
potentially stored before going through the tankless. Of course, costly
and who knows with continued incentives from energy companies and the feds
- it just might make sense to live "green" and spend less on energy.
Adam Venette
22 Dec 2009, 13:55
Tim,
On the tankless water heater discussion. I am battling well water with
sulfur odor at a weekend cabin. The pump/tank has a sulfur fitler unit,
and it has eliminated the smell from the cold water. However, it continues
to linger in the hot water from my current tank heater. My theory is that
the water in the heater is "cooking" with that bacteria for at least a
week, so that it is hard to eliminate it.
Would a tankless help me in that regard?
Colleen
27 Dec 2009, 12:40
I just bought a tankless water heater for my home and I love it. To me,
it's not about the "money I'll save." It's about my personal
responsibility and contribution toward an efficient, sustainable lifestyle
without depleting more of our limited resources.
If you're in it solely for the money, then perhaps the "math" doesn't make
sense. But - double check that math. In my state we get a $1500 tax refund
on tankless water heaters. The top of the line water heater cost me $1000.
Do the math now.
Russell Meyers
10 Jan 2010, 00:06
Honestly, I think tankless heaters are wonderful. Endless supply of hot
water and no expense for heating water which is not being used!
However, the current price of tankless heaters is an abomination. These
tanks require less materials and lower shipping than tank heaters.
Meanwhile, they use much of the same technology used in tank heaters. Even
were that not the case, this is NOT new technology. Tankless heaters have
been in use across Europe for decades. The apartment in Germany I lived in
had one in 1988! And it was already a few years old at that time.
My sentiment is to hold out on a tankless heater for now. Prices will
eventually decrease (and likely quality increase) in the next few years.
Tim gives great advice. Happy he's not jumping on the "It's new, it's
great" bandwagon.
Jamie Carroll
14 Jan 2010, 16:29
We live in Illinois, and really need a new a new water heater. Have decided
to go with a gas tankless water heater but do not know which one to choose.
Our main concern is being able to take 2 showers at the same time, run a
dishwater, load of laundry. Right now we have to wait 1/2 hour to take
showers. We don't want to spend and arm and a leg for this but do want to
buy the best one for our family of 5 needs. Budget is around $3000 with
unit and installation charges, don't want to spend that much if possible,
can you recommend a unit?
John
28 Feb 2010, 15:14
I have a question related to this. I am single and have a 2 1/2 bath home.
I have a working gas tank water heater, but i think if I I replace it with
a tankless it will save me a lot of money. I think the payoff maybe closer
to 5-7 years. Am I thinking correctly? Since I take short showers and it
seems to take a while to get hot water from the tank, i think I will be
better off with tankless.
Tankless Water Heater
To add a comment visit the Article Page.
Comments
21 Jan 2008, 11:09
Another, less noted advantage of tank water heaters in times of distress (earthquake, for example), is the reservoir for emergency. Most municipalities require heavy strapping for these, in case of motion. But at least you have 40 gallons or so of fresh water. Humans can last days without food, but not without good water.
For Mr. M. Thomas, I tried the link but I received the "404" page error. Thanks.
Best wishes to all,
Leonard Juska
Costa Mesa, CA
21 Jan 2008, 11:59
Would Bob really need to spend $1550 extra on a tankless water heater for his vacation home? A water heater sized for a household of five like yours has to be a lot bigger than one for a vacation home, plus he might be able to get by with one of a bit lesser quality since it will see less use and it is perhaps not as big of an issue if it fails. After all, he is only there during the summer, so his family could suffer through a few days of cold showers over the 4th of July more easily than they could in January!
I see tankless water heaters sized adequately for one shower at a time for $500 which would probably be fine for that vacation home (3 gpm, 60* temp rise, 10 yr warranty) To me, the advantages of not having to remember to turn the heater on/off when coming and going, draining it for the winter, etc. are probably worth spending a few hundred dollars more versus the standard 40 gallon tank.
Also consider the space savings, since vacation homes are often a bit cramped as it is. Finally, I think that endless hot water is almost a must have in a vacation home where you bring friends and their kids and the floor is covered with sleeping bags at night. It doesn't matter how big the tank is or how quickly you make the kids shower, it always runs out before the last person takes their shower!
21 Jan 2008, 13:12
Bob actually emailed me hours ago after he saw the column. Believe it or not, he said it is a large four-bedroom home and he expects guests that would be taking showers at the same time. So much for your pint-sized tankless heater suggestion. Bob might spend at least $1,200 more in 2008 dollars. People really need to do the math. As I said, if money is not an issue and you want continuous hot water these things are the bees' knees.
21 Jan 2008, 16:31
I thought it was useful - for one thing it included a link to the ONLY study I've ever been a able to find that evaluated tankless payback under controlled conditions simulating actual household use, and I wonder if whoever hit the delete button bothered to follow the primary link, or just assumed it was a SPAMed advert.
If anyone is curious you can probably GOOGLE it up, with was done by the / Exelon Services Federal Group (ESFG) for the Okaloosa Gas District.
22 Jan 2008, 08:52
They were deleted because the links didn't work........ It is not a conspiracy...... Instead of making everyone work to find it, can't you summarize in 100 words the findings? Just state the facts.....
23 Jan 2008, 20:12
Perhaps another concern to be taken into account is that of tank water heaters exploding. My grandparents heard of a few such events while talking to people who have vacation homes in the Island Park,ID area. I don't know how often tank heaters fail and the exact circumstances that cause it but, it was a serious concern with my grandparents when they would leave their cabin for extended periods. I also realize you're comparing the costs of new tanks, not old ones. How much do you think, of a difference in safety is there, if any, over the long term?
23 Jan 2008, 22:13
Newer water heaters have safety mechanisms to prevent that sort of thing, so it should be only older ones doing that. Mythbusters did a segment on that and they had to disable two separate safety mechanisms to get the water heater to go overpressure and explode. But when it did, it shot several hundred feet up in the air, you would not want to be home when one of those blew!
I would think the only risk of explosion with today's water heaters would be a gas explosion, which could happen with any gas fired water heater, with or without tank.
24 Jan 2008, 09:10
http://www.safteng.net/Accident%20Photos/Hot%20Water%20heater%20explosion.h tm
- or -
http://tinyurl.com/29hyyl
If someone is determined to run a gas fired unit at an unattended location, IMO an auto gas shutoff like the Watts 210-5 would be a Good Idea.
24 Jan 2008, 15:14
Ditto Doug. If the T & P valve and the gas valve fail, then explosion is a reality. I am not worried about mine.
28 Jan 2008, 12:54
At the house, we got a very large unit, a Rinnai. We have 3 teens and 2 exchange students so there is a lot of demand for hot water for showering and laundry. Bottomless hot water supply has really helped to get it all done without worrying about a showering schedule. We can start a load of laundry and hop in the shower, no problem. A side benefit which makes the economics work out is that by moving the hot water heater into a side closet, we gained a large pantry-size closet in a spot where storage was really needed. We could not have renovated to gain space there. Also, I do not have to worry about the tank leaking (which happened the day after we bought our first house, so I know it is possible!), ruining my pergo-style floors. The old tank was in an interior closet under the stairs. We had to move it to get a place to run the vent pipe.
At the cabin, we did have a water freeze last year, downstream from the water heater so its entire contents emptied into the cabin. This happened in an area which does not normally have a hard freeze, during a time when we go out there semi-weekly. We discovered it about 10 days after the leak happened, so we ended up in a major remodeling project which included tearing out a tub and replacing the subfloor under it. The insurance did not cover it because it was considered negligence. Bad surprise! I've switched insurance companies.
Anyway, the issue with getting a tankless system at the cabin was low water pressure because it is on a well that does not produce that much water. One plumber recommended against the system for that reason, but another plumber who installs these regularly said it would work because there was enough pressure to take a shower (he used a plumbing tool I don't own to determine the pressure). It works because we do have a tank for water in the pump house which is slightly uphill from the cabin and acts like a water tower. The brand we installed there is Noritz.
Anyway, it is great for cabin use. Like one commenter said, at a cabin you either have no use for hot water or you need great quantities of it. The tankless system is perfect for that. It does not take long to get hot water, so there is no great waste of water while you wait for the hot to get to the faucet. We can shower, run laundry and wash dishes all at the same time. I also was able to make one bedroom 3 feet larger by moving the heater to an unused closet in an adjoining room. The gain of this space far outstrips the cost of the heater.
One thing to consider is the electrical supply needed to start the system. We use an inverter and a marine battery if the power is off, but I believe there are other ways around it.
Water heaters do make good water storage devices for emergency use. You can get second hand ones cheap, possibly remove the element for better water quality, and store them out in the garage or some hidden area of your property in case you lose water. I wouldn't choose to keep a tank water heater just for the reason of emergency water storage. Based on my experiences at the cabin, you can go through a lot of water very fast by showering and doing laundry (we have a 1500 gallon tank), so one water heater is just a bare minimum supply.
In my case, I consider the units to be paid off already. I have gained storage space, living space, convenience, time, access to unlimited hot water when needed, and peace of mind that my tanks will not fail and get me involved in future emergency remodeling projects.
31 Jan 2008, 12:36
31 Jan 2008, 12:50
You have the lag time with either a storage or a tankless heater. If you want to discover much about recirculating loops, read all of those columns here at AsktheBuilder.com. I have several - gravity loops as well as pump systems.
01 Feb 2008, 19:36
OTOH, I found all the points in A. Rob's post about the many non-monetary benefits of a tankless system to be an equally valid perspective for those to whom the benefits matter. BTW, another benefit of many of the tankless systems which I did not see previously mentioned is that you can raise and lower the temperature of the hot water using a wall mounted remote control resembling a thermostat. Another potential benefit which is either quite valuable or completely meaningless depending on your personal opinion of it.
In my case, I'm still weighing the decision in my mind. I planning to have a major bit of plumbing work done in the near future to connect my 53 year old house in upstate NY to the town water and sewer lines. A scribbled note on my tank heater's manual says it was installed in 1979. So it seems like a good idea to replace it since it's coming up on its 29'th year. I'm guessing installing a new long warranty, energy saving tank heater would cost me ~$1000. A new tankless heater maybe twice that. Haven't decided which way to go yet.
One thing that confuses me about comparing costs is that it's hard to determine just how much I an paying for gas. The cost/therm varies during the year. In the summer I use less than 10 therms/month, but I effectively paid NYSEG over $3.35/therm for them. During the winter I use 100 therms or more each month, but the effect cost per therm is half what it is for a summer month.
08 Mar 2008, 09:04
However we have begun to have some worries as the tank is above the bathroom in a crawl space. If the tank ever develops a leak we would not know until something bad occurs, like the ceiling coming down, water stains, etc.
There is supposed to be a tray but if the leak was large enough and we didn't see the overflow then it could fail and release a high flow of water which would cause a lot of damage.
And so we are considering a tankless system more from the reliability point of view.
12 Mar 2008, 07:52
So tell me what happens when some part or connection fails on the tankless unit. Will the water go up or evaporate before it hits the ceiling? The reason you give would not convince me you need a tankless unit. You can easily install a drip pan with a 3-inch drain system that will take any amount of water a normal heater would produce - even in a catastrophic failure.
13 Mar 2008, 09:33
15 Mar 2008, 07:19
The answer is easy. Read the instructions provided by the manufacturer and then get the final word from your local plumbing inspector. Your local laws may not permit it.
31 Mar 2008, 11:47
The original heater was in the laundry room. When it failed after about 10 years, water seeped through adjacent walls destroying carpeting and vinyl flooring in connecting rooms.
The cathode tubes in the second heater decomposed sending shards of debris into all the water lines throughout the house and destroyed a new diswasher.
So, it should be apparent why I'm not enthusiastic about buying a 4th tank heater for my 27 year-old house.
However ---- any heater I buy needs to be electric. I'm not finding much information about electric powered on-demand heaters. So far, I've located only 2 manufacturers and neither seem to market a high-demand model.
What advice can you give me?
What can you tell me about
01 Apr 2008, 06:09
My tankless water heater columns pretty much tell the tale. The fuel source is of little importance since it is the same for whatever heater you buy. But in your case, wait till you get the bill for the new power line to the heater!!! Wow!!!
01 Apr 2008, 06:29
01 Apr 2008, 08:55
We ended up adding a gas line to the house, since we also converted a wood burning insert to a gas insert at the time. We convinced the gas company that this was our primary heat source to get the line from the street from them.
We have propane at the cabin and the unit works fine on LP gas. We did have to do some gas line plumbing (hired an expert) to get the gas to the heater location.
04 Apr 2008, 04:51
That is correct. Get the installation instructions for the unit you are considering. Wait until you see the amperage requirements. If you have a standard 240 volt 30-amp circuit, it is too small.
27 Apr 2008, 09:44
According to the date time stamps, I am a couple months late on this discussion. In any case, I just bought a small investment home, it's approx 648 sq ft. I am thinking of installing the Eemax EX190TC in order to both save space and save money. The existing water heater is shot so the replacement is a must. It is also gas and I am going all electric in this house. I will be running all lines, water and electric myself and will only need to fork out for the electrician to install the breaker and connect as I am afraid of electricity. There are only three points requiring hot water: The 1 bathroom and the kitchen (no dishwasher).
Any suggestions?
Thank you.
21 May 2008, 09:44
25 May 2008, 09:22
Lisa
25 Oct 2008, 06:00
21 Jan 2009, 09:54
29 Jan 2009, 00:58
We chalked that up to a rotten company and bought a Bosch from a reputable local plumbing company.
It's approximately a year later, and this morning the Bosch started leaking.
During the process of the second installation, we had a water filtration system installed, in case it was sediment in the water causing the damage.
The plumber comes tomorrow and I'm feverishly look for the paperwork, hoping the thing is still under warranty.
We're in Southern Cal, so it can't be working too hard to heat water.
Besides this pesky little leaking problem (my concerns involve water + electricity) these are the greatest things since sliced bread. I can do laundry, run the dishwasher and shower all at the same time.
Now, if only I could do those without fear of electrocution in the shower and being found by the paramedics in that state.
02 Feb 2009, 18:36
I decided to do some digging, and I found the cost delta to be about $500 on ebay for the quoted equipment. So, even allowing for $1000 additional cost of installation of the tankless version, there seemed to about $1700 of additional markup on the tankless by the plumber. Not sure, if this is generally the case for all tankless or just the one I was quoted. The referred models were Bradford White 50 gallon and Rinnai 199,000 BTUs.
28 Feb 2009, 15:15
The huge attraction for us was unlimited supply, use less propane which for us meant less chance of needing a fill up in winter when the trucks can't get out here. And to save some money. The largest attraction was the ability to take showers w/no power.. we run our tankless on a battery backup and with it's 2amp draw the battery backup lasts approx 30min. For one person that could be a weeks worth of showers, and during the winter it is not uncommon for us to lose power that long. (Not to mention we could recharge it on the generator if we need be.)
Also, since ours cost us $0 other than the vent kit, we are saving $$$ from day one.
I`d like to suggest people on wells use a ~$50 basic sediment filter prior to feeding your hot water heater... it will keep it cleaner and running better in between flushes.
Great site!
13 Mar 2009, 08:09
13 Mar 2009, 13:49
A good solution?
18 Apr 2009, 14:18
14 May 2009, 16:19
We're concerned for safety but aren't sure what to do.
15 Jun 2009, 19:06
What is the correct process for removing water from a tankless water heater for winter? I'm concerned about residual water freezing and cracking the heater.
All waterlines have previously been drained by gravity. I plan to now begin using an air compressor to blow out lines starting at outdoor faucets. I'll also re-do the plumbing to remove a mix of old iron pipes and poly pipes and replace those with PEX.
11 Jul 2009, 17:19
Where are you? You haven't answered a single question for over a year on this post. Tankless H2O heaters are the future if they go with the right company and plumber. These have been used in Asia and Europe for years and do save energy which translates to money. The Government rebates now are up to $1400 which covers most of the difference between a tank heater and tankless including installation and venting. I recommend Noritz and will be glad to assist you and answer all of your questions at 1(843)577-0801. Tim, Sorry for the shameless plug but someone needs to answer all of these questions.
07 Sep 2009, 23:52
22 Dec 2009, 13:55
On the tankless water heater discussion. I am battling well water with sulfur odor at a weekend cabin. The pump/tank has a sulfur fitler unit, and it has eliminated the smell from the cold water. However, it continues to linger in the hot water from my current tank heater. My theory is that the water in the heater is "cooking" with that bacteria for at least a week, so that it is hard to eliminate it.
Would a tankless help me in that regard?
27 Dec 2009, 12:40
If you're in it solely for the money, then perhaps the "math" doesn't make sense. But - double check that math. In my state we get a $1500 tax refund on tankless water heaters. The top of the line water heater cost me $1000. Do the math now.
10 Jan 2010, 00:06
However, the current price of tankless heaters is an abomination. These tanks require less materials and lower shipping than tank heaters. Meanwhile, they use much of the same technology used in tank heaters. Even were that not the case, this is NOT new technology. Tankless heaters have been in use across Europe for decades. The apartment in Germany I lived in had one in 1988! And it was already a few years old at that time.
My sentiment is to hold out on a tankless heater for now. Prices will eventually decrease (and likely quality increase) in the next few years.
Tim gives great advice. Happy he's not jumping on the "It's new, it's great" bandwagon.
14 Jan 2010, 16:29
28 Feb 2010, 15:14
Thanks,
John
To add a comment visit the Article Page.